Will humans survive on a warming planet

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Papers should be 3 pages, double-spaced (11 or 12 pt font) in length. Structure them thusly:

1.    What for you were the most important points that you took from the readings, discussion and lecture material for the week? This is an exercise in abstract thinking—what is the ‘big picture?’ You should touch on each reading assignment, discuss any common threads between them, or differences. I want to see what you got out of the readings and the week’s topic, and gauge your depth of understanding. I’m not looking for book reports here—do some summary, but your paper should be no more than 1/3 summary (and no less than 2/3 analysis).

 
 

2.    Demonstrate you read the discussion board. I don’t need a play-by-play blow of people’s postings, I just want you to demonstrate you went through the postings, and got something out of the process. How did people respond to the material for the week? What was your take? Just keep in mind—take a stand, but don’t make points if you’re not going to support them with evidence or logic.
3.    Standards. This is making up for your having missed the discussion boards, so I expect the same amount of intellectual effort to go into the make-up. Good writing, use of complete sentences, paragraphs to change ideas, citing of authors’ works at the end. Demonstrate you’ve been through all of the readings and lecture material.

Articles:

http://blackboard.eou.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-591774-dt-content-rid-1080551_1/courses/SOC205_65691_W14/Kolbert2.pdf

http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/idUS65555+17-Oct-2012+BW20121017

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html

Some Like It Hot

Lecture notes:

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw1/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw2/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw3/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw5/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw6/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw7/

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Will humans survive on a warming planet

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Papers should be 3 pages, double-spaced (11 or 12 pt font) in length. Structure them thusly:

1.    What for you were the most important points that you took from the readings, discussion and lecture material for the week? This is an exercise in abstract thinking—what is the ‘big picture?’ You should touch on each reading assignment, discuss any common threads between them, or differences. I want to see what you got out of the readings and the week’s topic, and gauge your depth of understanding. I’m not looking for book reports here—do some summary, but your paper should be no more than 1/3 summary (and no less than 2/3 analysis).

 
 

2.    Demonstrate you read the discussion board. I don’t need a play-by-play blow of people’s postings, I just want you to demonstrate you went through the postings, and got something out of the process. How did people respond to the material for the week? What was your take? Just keep in mind—take a stand, but don’t make points if you’re not going to support them with evidence or logic.
3.    Standards. This is making up for your having missed the discussion boards, so I expect the same amount of intellectual effort to go into the make-up. Good writing, use of complete sentences, paragraphs to change ideas, citing of authors’ works at the end. Demonstrate you’ve been through all of the readings and lecture material.

Articles:

http://blackboard.eou.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-591774-dt-content-rid-1080551_1/courses/SOC205_65691_W14/Kolbert2.pdf

http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/idUS65555+17-Oct-2012+BW20121017

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html

Some Like It Hot

Lecture notes:

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw1/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw2/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw3/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw5/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw6/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-4/gw7/

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

What are the main obstacles for the AU in bringing peace and security to Somalia

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

a) Introduction – 1 page
b) Literature review – 2 page
c) Research design – 3 pages

1) Introduction :- This needs to be clear and concise with your central and relatively narrow focus brought upfront, ideally putting the basic elements of your research questions into the first paragraph or even the first sentence. The introduction contains the question, and its relevance.
2) Literature review: What we expect you to use literature from the other two modules whenever relevant in helping you to understand two things: a) what research has already been conducted that is relevant to your research question; and b) how it has been conducted. That is, how did scholars go out into the world and produce this knowledge.
3) Research design:- Here, you must refer back to the literature review and conduct your own plan of how to go out and conduct research that helps answer your research question. You need to be able to argue the relevance of your research design, both in terms of the research question, and be reflexive on how it produces valid and coherent knowledge. In particular, state and justify your data collection method.

 
 

NB: yo are not expected to conduct the research here, but write it as if you would so that it is convincing research design.

1) Make sure you referencing fits with the format as outlined in the expanded syllabus. This will affect your grade, since it relates to the overall professionalism of the text.

2) Remember that the assignment is a research design and not an actual essay. Read through the guidance in the syllabus, as well as the examples of previous assignments, if you’re not sure.

3) In professional writing, avoid colloquial abbrevations like ‘you’re’, ‘don’t’, ‘couldn’t’, and so on. These are for more conversational forms of writing, like this email.

4) This is an IR assignment, meaning that you need to frame your topic in terms of its relevance to IR (International Relations).

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

What are the main obstacles for the AU in bringing peace and security to Somalia

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

a) Introduction – 1 page
b) Literature review – 2 page
c) Research design – 3 pages

1) Introduction :- This needs to be clear and concise with your central and relatively narrow focus brought upfront, ideally putting the basic elements of your research questions into the first paragraph or even the first sentence. The introduction contains the question, and its relevance.
2) Literature review: What we expect you to use literature from the other two modules whenever relevant in helping you to understand two things: a) what research has already been conducted that is relevant to your research question; and b) how it has been conducted. That is, how did scholars go out into the world and produce this knowledge.
3) Research design:- Here, you must refer back to the literature review and conduct your own plan of how to go out and conduct research that helps answer your research question. You need to be able to argue the relevance of your research design, both in terms of the research question, and be reflexive on how it produces valid and coherent knowledge. In particular, state and justify your data collection method.

 
 

NB: yo are not expected to conduct the research here, but write it as if you would so that it is convincing research design.

1) Make sure you referencing fits with the format as outlined in the expanded syllabus. This will affect your grade, since it relates to the overall professionalism of the text.

2) Remember that the assignment is a research design and not an actual essay. Read through the guidance in the syllabus, as well as the examples of previous assignments, if you’re not sure.

3) In professional writing, avoid colloquial abbrevations like ‘you’re’, ‘don’t’, ‘couldn’t’, and so on. These are for more conversational forms of writing, like this email.

4) This is an IR assignment, meaning that you need to frame your topic in terms of its relevance to IR (International Relations).

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Amazon grocery

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Amazon grocery is the on line grocery division of Amazon.com. Aldi is a brick and mortar grocery. You are to use the table below to compare and contrast Amazon and Aldi on the following points:

1.      Demographic, economic, and socio-cultural trends and changes. Explain how each organization has interpreted these trends and changes in its choice of strategy?

2.      Is their strategy affected by the amount of advertising they do on television and the internet?

Choose one of these organizations that you think is currently positioned better and explain why?

1.      What strategy would you recommend for the organization you chose based on recent trends and changes?

2.      How can these strategies improve that organization’s image as a “corporate citizen” within the community?

 
 
Question Aldi                  Amazon  Amazon
Demographics
Socio-cultural
Economics
Advertising
Better Positioned
Recommended Stratgey for the better positioned

 

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Amazon grocery

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Amazon grocery is the on line grocery division of Amazon.com. Aldi is a brick and mortar grocery. You are to use the table below to compare and contrast Amazon and Aldi on the following points:

1.      Demographic, economic, and socio-cultural trends and changes. Explain how each organization has interpreted these trends and changes in its choice of strategy?

2.      Is their strategy affected by the amount of advertising they do on television and the internet?

Choose one of these organizations that you think is currently positioned better and explain why?

1.      What strategy would you recommend for the organization you chose based on recent trends and changes?

2.      How can these strategies improve that organization’s image as a “corporate citizen” within the community?

 
 
Question Aldi                  Amazon  Amazon
Demographics
Socio-cultural
Economics
Advertising
Better Positioned
Recommended Stratgey for the better positioned

 

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Do we have a free press

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Papers should be 3 pages, double-spaced (11 or 12 pt font) in length. Structure them thusly:

1.    What for you were the most important points that you took from the readings, discussion and lecture material for the week? This is an exercise in abstract thinking—what is the ‘big picture?’ You should touch on each reading assignment, discuss any common threads between them, or differences. I want to see what you got out of the readings and the week’s topic, and gauge your depth of understanding. I’m not looking for book reports here—do some summary, but your paper should be no more than 1/3 summary (and no less than 2/3 analysis).

 
 

2.    Demonstrate you read the discussion board. I don’t need a play-by-play blow of people’s postings, I just want you to demonstrate you went through the postings, and got something out of the process. How did people respond to the material for the week? What was your take? Just keep in mind—take a stand, but don’t make points if you’re not going to support them with evidence or logic.
3.    Standards. This is making up for your having missed the discussion boards, so I expect the same amount of intellectual effort to go into the make-up. Good writing, use of complete sentences, paragraphs to change ideas, citing of authors’ works at the end. Demonstrate you’ve been through all of the readings and lecture material.

Articles/lecture material:

http://blackboard.eou.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-591772-dt-content-rid-1080394_1/courses/SOC205_66143_W14/JunkFood13.pdf

http://www.globalissues.org/article/159/media-conglomerates-mergers-concentration-of-ownership

http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/findings/vnrs

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-2/charles-pierces-premises-of-idiot-america/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-2/some-news-sources/

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Do we have a free press

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!

Papers should be 3 pages, double-spaced (11 or 12 pt font) in length. Structure them thusly:

1.    What for you were the most important points that you took from the readings, discussion and lecture material for the week? This is an exercise in abstract thinking—what is the ‘big picture?’ You should touch on each reading assignment, discuss any common threads between them, or differences. I want to see what you got out of the readings and the week’s topic, and gauge your depth of understanding. I’m not looking for book reports here—do some summary, but your paper should be no more than 1/3 summary (and no less than 2/3 analysis).

 
 

2.    Demonstrate you read the discussion board. I don’t need a play-by-play blow of people’s postings, I just want you to demonstrate you went through the postings, and got something out of the process. How did people respond to the material for the week? What was your take? Just keep in mind—take a stand, but don’t make points if you’re not going to support them with evidence or logic.
3.    Standards. This is making up for your having missed the discussion boards, so I expect the same amount of intellectual effort to go into the make-up. Good writing, use of complete sentences, paragraphs to change ideas, citing of authors’ works at the end. Demonstrate you’ve been through all of the readings and lecture material.

Articles/lecture material:

http://blackboard.eou.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-591772-dt-content-rid-1080394_1/courses/SOC205_66143_W14/JunkFood13.pdf

http://www.globalissues.org/article/159/media-conglomerates-mergers-concentration-of-ownership

http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/findings/vnrs

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-2/charles-pierces-premises-of-idiot-america/

https://people.eou.edu/socprob/readings/week-2/some-news-sources/

 
 
Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!