Business assignment

 

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

This essay will be divided into Part A and Part B on the basis of a case study to indicate how to make strategy when starting a business. A correct strategy can help to understand how to assign works to ensure members will play well in their roles.
Within the case, four university students have operated a baker business in their university. The current situation is that they need to reevaluate the existing strategy since operations cannot be well to deal with daily demands. Such kind of effectiveness also has let many customers feel disappointed. They hope to seek better solutions to deal with the current issue.
On the basis of requirements, it will firstly compare essential characteristics of partnerships, co-operatives and companies related to business structures:
Firstly, all of these three types have different functions to be used during operations for different purposes if people are dealing with businesses.
After the provision of relevant information in terms of different business structure and the understanding of the existing situation of Bio Breads, a manner suggestion is to use the partnership. Reasons will be listed as follows:
Firstly, when becoming a member within a partnership business network, it can ensure to improve the motivation practice during operations. The current urgent thing is to recover trusts of target customers to let them still believe they can be served timely. If Bio Breads can find a good partnership source and develop as its member party, it can ensure an entire good environment will help to improve the operational effectiveness. In such scenario, internal human capitals will be easy to encourage and they would understand clear about their behaviors will represent for the image of the brand. If they want to improve the current poor performance to compete for more customers, they should be more initiative and be collective oriented. However, when people are engaged, they can be more likely to think critically so that different viewpoints can be generated to give options to deal with one thing (Seitanidi, Koufopoulos & Palmer, 2010). To some extent, it can help to nurture new ideas and to improve the innovation ability.

Business assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Analysis on the use of CPM in business strategy management

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Analysis on the use of CPM in business strategy management
Introduction
The purpose of this essay is to analysis whether Competitive Profile Matrix can create powerful visual catch-point tool and be the basis of the company’s strategy or not. In modern economic market environment, if an organization wants to stand firm in the fierce market competition, it should use strategic management (Brindza, Sprouse and Thompson, 2011). Therefore, there is always a need to expand and develop any tool adopted in strategic decision-making. Companies nowadays are trying to advance their traditional multi-matrix approaches in strategy analysis (David, 2009). The conventional matrices adopted in strategic planning and analysis can provide valuable insight towards a company’s future competition position.
A CPM can create the powerful visual and to convey information related to the organization’s potential competitive advantage (Raos and Sivaramakrishna, 2008). Generally, the critical success factors in a CPM include both the external and internal issues. The internal factors evaluation matrix will summarize organizations’ major internal weaknesses and strengths while the external factors evaluation matrix can essentially be a synopsis of the organizations’ external environment’s major threats and opportunities (Amason, 2011). They can help to impact the organization. In other words, internal factor and external factor evaluation matrices are able to allow the organizations to visualize their weaknesses, strengths,
Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discountedthreats and opportunities while CPM utilize those critical success factors to compare itself to other competitors. In analyzing the past, present and future objectives of their competitors, organizations will be able to develop more strategic and comprehensive business plans that take advantage of their weakness and to promote their own strengths (Weerakkody and Reddick, 2013). However, different people hold different idea towards this point of view. Some professors regard CPM as the basis of a company’s strategy while some others were arguing that there are still many limitations. The following literature reviews will critically analysis the use of CPM in modern business management according to the past studies and researches.
Conclusions
This paper has attempted to conduct literature review and critical analysis of the using of CPM in business strategy management. Strategy management is something about to gain and maintain competitive advantages. It can also be defined as “anything that an organization does especially well when compared to its rival firms.” That is to say, when an organization can do something that its rival firms cannot do well, or the organization owns something its rival firm’s desire, it will represent as the organization’s competitive advantage. Poter (2008) mentioned that getting and keeping the competitive advantages is of great importance for long term success in the business development for an organization. The pursuit of competitive advantages can lead to the organizational success or failure. In other words, strategic management practitioners and researchers alike desire to better understand the nature and the role of competitive advantages in a variety of industries.
The use of CPM analysis does help organizations making effective strategies management for their business, but it still has some disadvantages people cannot ignore. However, if the organizations can take advantage of its strength and have clear idea of its shortcomings and try to avoid the passive effect of CPM, they can still get a lot of benefits from the analysis and make their business strategy management effective and appropriate. Normally, an organization can sustain the competitive advantages for only a certain period, because its rival firms can undermine and imitate the advantages (Jeschke, 2008). It is not adequate to simply obtain the competitive advantages. Therefore, an organization must strive to achieve the sustained competitive advantages. Firstly, it can continually adapt to the changes in both internal capabilities, resources and competencies and the external events and trends. Secondly, organizations can effectively formulate, implement and evaluate strategies which can capitalize upon those factors they analyzed. Thirdly, when an organization is doing CPM analysis for managing its business strategies, it is better if it combines the analysis with SWOT Matrix, Internal Factor Evaluation, External Factor Evaluation, Strategic Position and Action Evaluation and so on. Every strategy has to be made cautiously, because every step for organization’s moving forward is essential for business development. In a word, organization should be critical while conducting the CPM analysis for their business strategy promotion.

Business assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Business assignment

Executive summary
The environmental protection plan aims to improve the current practice of Toyota to better carry out its ethical business behaviors. The purpose is to hope the new environmental system to facilitate Toyota to be more environmentally friendly and improve the social reputation.
Toyota is a Japanese automobile brand and it has also been identified as the No. 1 vehicle brand in the world. In practice, the company has used various sales strategies to ensure diverse requirements of different customers in different segments markets can be satisfied. Still, Toyota strives to reinforce its environmental management to realize the sustainable development.
But it is essential to recognize that production for vehicles will bring more pollution problems. Without green awareness, it cannot ensure the company will be able to implement relevant social responsibilities initiatively. A healthy and safe world will be suitable for people to live, but companies should recognize that if they will not be initiatively to behave ethically, in most case, a great living environment will just be a dream (Blackburn, 2012). Therefore, it is quite urgent for decision makers to assess existing environmental performance within the company so that it will understand which advices will be beneficial and which advices maybe not appropriate.
Discussions of Government Policy
In conclusion, major objectives of Toyota’s new environmental policy will focus on improving the existing environment management to meet its Fifth Environmental Action Plan to maintain relationships with relevant stakeholders.
Leadership should display the powerful and ethical role to manage internal resources; employees should actively engage in their roles to contribute productively; existing CRM needs to be improved to better dealing with relationships with customers; SCM also needs to be enhanced to let Eco-techniques be integrated effectively; the participation of social activities need to be increased to compete for more support from the government when implementing the new environmental policy; in addition, social media can be relied on to let Toyota conduct more recycling educations.

Digger J Jones. Close Reading Literature assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Assignment 2: Close Reading
This assignment requires you to perform a close reading of a passage from Digger J Jones. It is worth 40% of your marks for this unit.
A close reading, sometimes called an explication, is a very detailed examination of a passage from a text (or scene from a film). A close textual analysis of even a short extract will offer insights into the text as whole.

Instructions
Undertake a close reading of the passage below. Ensure that you:
·         Locate the passage in the context of the plot and themes of the novel as a whole;
·         Explain how the narrative and language features of the excerpt are used to position the implied reader in relation to the protagonist and his experience of the politics of the 1967 Referendum and the Vietnam War, by drawing upon and applying aspects of narrative theory from Week 5
·         Comment on the protagonist’s struggle to reconcile his Indigenous culture and community with the dominant white culture around him, paying particular attention to the notions of hybridity, intersectionality and the representation of identity and history (key ideas from the unit materials for Weeks 6 and 7)
·         Support your own original analysis with direct quotation from the relevant e-readings in your study guide and your own independent research (that is, at least one relevant, scholarly source you have found yourself in addition to those supplied for you in the Study Guide).

The close reading should be 1500 words long and written as an academic essay: it requires an introduction, a body of discussion based on evidence, proper citations, and a conclusion and reference list. Information about how to accurately cite material from the primary text (the novel) and  secondary sources (e-readings etc.) and construct a list of references can be found at: Harvard Referencing Guide
The close reading should be uploaded to the Assignment 2 Dropbox on CloudDeakin on or before the due date. As for Assignment 1, students who wish to apply for an extension or Special Consideration must do so well in advance of the due date, and provide relevant supporting documentation. Work that is late will be penalised 5% of the overall mark per day overdue.

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

The passage 

Saturday 4th February
The Letter
My big brother is dead. I wanna write him a letter.
Dear Paul,
Maybe you can see the tears on the page. I didn’t know you was overseas. I didn’t really know much about the war. Pop said you gave a good account of yourself. Dad just walked up and down. I never seen him drink before. He had a big talk to me, said I was the eldest now and I had to be more grown-up. Mum just sits there with your photo. The one from when you was a recruit.
All me mates want to know if you got a medal. I tell ’em of course you did.
They are gunna bring your body home next week. I heard the oldies talking about it. Uncle Tim said he’d get ‘em all digging the grave at Condah cemetery. Pop said him and Dad and the other uncles would escort you home. Everyone says you got to be buried at home.
I’m gunna ask Pop if I can escort you too.
I miss you.
Digger
Tuesday 7th February,
Afternoon
The army comes to my house
Dear Paulie,
The army came around, an old bloke and a young bloke, and they spoke to the adults. I hid behind the door so they couldn’t see me and listened. They reckon that your body will fly in tomorrow. After they left, Mum and Nan cried. Dad and Pop went outside smoking and I went with them. Dad cuddled me under the clothesline real hard until it hurt.
Pop brushed the hair out of my eyes and said that we’ll be taking you home tomorrow night. He said that I could go with him and Dad if I wanted.
I asked him where you had been and he said Vietnam. I asked him where that is and he said overseas in Asia. I still don’t know where it is.
From Digger
Source: Digger J. Jones, pp. 7-9.

Digger J Jones. Close Reading Literature assignment 代写
Learning Aims and Marking Criteria
The aim of this assignment is to assist students to:
·         Evaluate their understanding of concepts and terms introduced to date;
·         Practise skills in reading with a purpose;
·         Develop greater critical awareness of how narrative and language strategies produce textual meaning;
·         Use academic research and scholarship, supplied in the e-readings, to support well-informed analysis;
·         Avoid writing based on impressions or uncritical literary appreciation.
When marking your close readings, the marker will assess your knowledge of:
·         Digger J Jones as a whole, not just the extract supplied;
·         Relevant literary terms and concepts that you apply to the texts;
·         Academic citation and referencing conventions (Deakin Harvard) as applied to the primary sources (novels) and secondary sources (e-readings and other material you use).
Your marker will also assess your ability to:
·         Perform a close analysis based on original thinking;
·         Choose relevant evidence from the set text and critically engage with key ideas found in e-readings to support an interpretation;
·         Produce a coherent and logically structured piece of writing with an introduction and conclusion, and correct spelling, punctuation and syntax;
·         Complete the assessment task on time and within the prescribed word-length (no more than 10% more or less).
Digger J Jones. Close Reading Literature assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

blue mountain hospital assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Assignment 1 – Research Report, Hospitality Industry
Deliverables:              1000 word annotated bibliography
2000 word research report
Due Dates:          Annotate bibliography – Monday 5pm, Week 5
Research Report – Monday 5pm, Week 8

Grades:        Annotated Bibliography: 20% final grade
Research Report: 30% final grade

Select a topic from the list below.
Carry out research to find out some important dates and historic moments associated with the topic you have chosen. You will develop a 1000 word annotated bibliography (200 words per journal article) and write a 2000 word research report describing how that key development influenced/influences the modern visitor economy.
The annotated bibliography will consist of five 200-word annotations of the five references that you source for your final report.
You will use the annotated bibliography to assist you to write your final research report.
Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted
Below is a list of ten key developments that have had a major impact in the development of the visitor economy.

  1. The earliest hotels – food and lodging for travelers and their livestock
  2. The introduction of coffee in the 17th century – French and British Coffee Houses and the wide impact of their wider social development role
  3. The Industrial revolution in late 18th and early 19th centuries and the advent of rail travel  – meant people could work away from home
  4. The development of hotel ‘Franchise Chains’ with the Hotel Ritz in Paris and the Ritz-Carlton in the USA – their social contribution and impact on the workforce
  5. The advent of air travel and the development of luxury sea travel
  6. Economic development after World War II producing an increased market of business travelers and tourists
  7. Holidays for all!- The growth of tourism and hospitality as commercial industries in their own right in the late 20th century
  8. The global technological advancement of the 20th and 21st centuries
  9. The advent of major and mega events in the 20th century
  10. The Global financial situation in the early 21st century

What is an annotated bibliography?
An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.
The process
Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research.
First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly examine and review the actual items. Then choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic.
Cite the book, article, or document using the appropriate style.
Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work illuminates your bibliography topic.
Permission to reproduce and adapt granted from Cornel University Library
(Cornell University 2016: NP)
blue mountain hospital assignment 代写

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Submission Guidelines:
•      Typedinformatspecified(refertoCALS)andtobesubmittedinelectronicformasaword-processedfiletowww.turnitin.combefore5:00pm Monday of Week 8
•      Aschoolassessmentcoversheetplusthemarkingguidetobeincludedwithyourpaper.
•      Completeandattachaplagiarismform.Pleasenotethatplagiarismisaseriousacademicoffence.PleaserefertoCALSforabetterunderstandingonhowplagiarismisdetectedandcanbeprevented.
•      Aminimumof5 journalsaretobeused

References:
Cornell University Library 2016, How to Prepare an Annotated bibliography: The Annotated Bibliography. Olin Library Reference Research & Learning Services Cornell University Library, Ithaca, NY, USA. http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography, Accessed 20 January 2017)

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

 

HI5019 SIS Literature Review assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017
HOLMES INSTITUTE
FACULTY OF
HIGHER EDUCATION
Assignment 1 (Literature Review)
Individual Assignment
HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017
WEEK 6 Friday 5 pm
Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than 2000 words. The review should
demonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should use
examples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books and
professional magazines to support their arguments
The literature review would be on an organisation (company) that is using accounting
software packages in Australia. The research would cover:
PART 1
1. The current organizational structure
2. What operational problems (e.g., inefficiency, errors) do you think the organisation
could experience because of this structure?
3. What is the most likely system acquisition method— commercial software, custom
software, or ERP?
4. Describes and prepare a system flowchart of the sales procedures for the chosen
organisation (company)
5. Identify any control problems in the system and what sorts of fraud are possible in
this system?
PART 2
1. Development and adoption of the accounting software packages,
2. The current market size,
3. Identify the leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage,
4. Identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers of
accounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations.
HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017
Submission Requirements:
Research reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 Calibri
Font and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used in
the research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself with
the topic.
Submission:
 Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box and a copy of the first page of the
report generated from SAFE ASSIGN attached to it.
 Soft copy to self-check and Final Submission
You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your research
should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words. All
reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached.
Assessment Criteria:
Score  Very Good (15/15)  Good (11/15)  Satisfactory (9/15)  Unsatisfactory (5/15)
Presentation
and writing style
/15 marks

HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写

Information is well organized.
Correct layout including times
new roman, font size 12 or
calibri, font size10, double
spaced. About the right
length.
Very well written, excellent
paraphrasing and proper
grammar and punctuation are
used throughout.
Information is
organized, Correct
layout including
times new roman,
font size 12 or
calibri, font size10,
double spaced.
About the right
length.
Well written, some
paraphrasing and
proper grammar and
punctuation
Information is
somewhat
organized, Some
elements of layout
or length incorrect.
Proper grammar
and punctuation
mostly used, but
overuse of direct
quotes.
Information is poorly
organized, Some
elements of layout
or length incorrect.
Proper grammar and
punctuation not
always used.
Excessive overuse of
direct quotes
Score  Very Good (15/15)  Good (11/15)  Satisfactory (9/15)  Unsatisfactory (5/15)
Introduction
/15 marks
Introduces the topic of the
research report in an
extremely engaging manner
which arouses the reader’s
interest.
Gives a detailed general
background and indicates the
overall “plan”.
Introduces the topic
of the research
report in an
engaging manner
which arouses the
reader’s interest.
Gives some general
background and
indicates the overall
“plan” of the report.
Satisfactorily
introduces the
topic of the
research report.
Gives a general
background.
Indicates the
overall “plan” of
the report.
Introduces the topic
of the research
report, but omits a
general background
of the topic and/or
the overall “plan” of
the report.
Score  Very Good (20/20)  Good (15/20)  Satisfactory (10/20) Unsatisfactory (7/20)
Evidence of
Research
/20 marks
Substantial range of
appropriate and current,
supportive evidence
Good range of
appropriate and
current, supportive
evidence.
Suitable range of
supportive
evidence used. Not
always appropriate
and/or current.
Minimum cited.
Insufficient range or
number of
supportive evidence
used.
HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017
Score  Very Good (30/30)  Good (23/30)  Satisfactory (16/30) Unsatisfactory
(10/30)
Development of
Discussion
/30 marks
Logical, insightful, original
discussion with well-
connected paragraphs.
Evidence of full engagement
with the literature found, with
relevant and detailed analysis.
Detailed, original
discussion develops
logically with some
connection between
adjoining
paragraphs.
Understanding of
reading shown.
Some relevant
analysis.
Adequate
discussion develops
logically.
Understanding of
reading shown.
Few relevant
analysis.
Inadequate
discussion of issues
and/or lacking in
logical flow
Little/no
demonstrated
understanding of
reading.
None/little
discussion or
analysis.
Score  Very Good (10/10)  Good (7/10)  Satisfactory (5/10)  Unsatisfactory (3/10)
Conclusion
/10 marks
An interesting, well written
summary of the main points.
An excellent final comment on
the subject, based on the
information provided.
A good summary of
the main points.
A good final
comment on the
subject, based on
the information
provided.
Satisfactory
summary of the
main points.
A final comment on
the subject, but
introduced new
material.
Poor/no summary of
the main points.
A poor final
comment on the
subject and/or new
material introduced.
Score  Very Good (10/10)  Good (7/10)  Satisfactory (5/10)  Unsatisfactory (3/10)
Referencing
/10 marks
Correct referencing (Harvard)
All quoted material in quotes
and acknowledged.
All paraphrased material
acknowledged.
Correctly set out reference list
and bibliography included.
Mostly correct
referencing
(Harvard)
All quoted material
in quotes and
acknowledged. All
paraphrased
material
acknowledged.
Mostly correct
setting out reference
list and bibliography
included.
Mostly correct
referencing
(Harvard) Some
problems with
quoted material
and paraphrased
material
Some problems
with the reference
list or bibliography.
Not all material
correctly
acknowledged.
Some problems with
the reference list or
bibliography.
Total
/100 marks
Final marks
/20
General
Comments:

service quality in five-star hotels Literature Review

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

service quality in five-star hotels Literature Review 代写

Assessment 3 – Literature Review (1,000 word)
Journal article only

(Start in understanding ‘hotel’ thenmove to 5-star hotel)

A literature review is an essential piece of academic writing that discusses and evaluates research literature relevant to a specific topic, including what is known about the topic in literature, how study findings are similar/dissimilar and whether there is a gap in current knowledge.

The topic of your literature review is ‘service quality in five-star hotels’. It is anticipated that your literature review will be structured using sub-headings related to the topic.

The following structure is to be used for your Literature Review:
Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted
Introduction
Introduce the reader by stating the purpose of the Literature Review, and briefly introduce the topic area. Outline the structure and key content of the review (this is called the ‘scope’ of the assignment).

Body sub-sections related to topic
Discuss literature based on themes related to the topic of service quality on five-star hotels.

Conclusion
Re-iterate the purpose of the Literature Review and the key discussions made.

References
Listed on a new page in alphabetical order using APA 6th referencing style.

service quality in five-star hotels Literature Review

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Africa Book Book Review/Reading Assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Africa Book Book Review/Reading Assignment 代写

Book Review/Reading Assignment   Africa_SM2_2017

Book review/reading assignment (worth 20%) 1000 words. Due 20 Aug (sun.)11pm.   Submit online only on ‘Assignment’ tab.
SEE Separate sheet on LMS – summary only follows
Read one of the African novels on the list on LMS (or find another with tutor/my approval). In 1000 words, write a book review of the work. Show how the book presents Africa and African life, and offer critical observations. Detailed requirements and topical questions are set out on a separate assignment sheet. Do not submit reviews already done for ‘Scarcity’ or other subjects.
Note: we have brilliant plagiarism software. Assignments are submitted electronically and compared with all websites, and all previous university assignments. Anything copied from anywhere else needs to be in quote marks and cited.  Penalties for academic dishonesty will range from a mark of 0 to heavy % reductions. If in doubt see https://academichonesty.unimelb.edu.au/  or ask your tutors.
 Late penalty: 5% per day
Special consideration (e.g. Medical certs for late work) is now done through your Student Portal.

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted
Read one of the African novels on the LMS document (or find another with tutor’s approval). We are interested in novels not academic texts or textbooks. In 1,000 words, write a “book review” of the work. Show how the book presents Africa and African life, and offer your own critical observations of the book.

The aim is to get you into the habit of reading critically, by providing a review of a novel that is written by an African author, or describes/is set in Africa.
Try to be selective in your choice of book; choose something you actually want to study. Reviews should always be written as though they are going appear in an academic journal. This means full bibliographic details at the top, and your name visible. Have a look at how academic reviews in that and other journals are structured.  It goes without saying that I expect you to read the book! Avoid any previously published  reviews of it (and especially student reviews) on the web or in journals.
Africa Book Book Review/Reading Assignment 代写
Reviews are marked on
ï      quality of your analysis
ï      structure of your review – move from an introduction to the key points you wish to make, then conclude.
ï      proper bibliography (if needed)
ï      good use of sources (if needed)- proper citation of ideas and quotations
ï      no plagiarism or misuse of sources and web sites
ï      We will award minimal % for good presentation.

The majority of marks will be awarded for the quality of your analysis of the book. So make sure you set the book in context (author’s reputation? Place where it is set? is it part of a series etc.?), describe its contents in brief, before offering critical judgments.
Usually reviewers have a good knowledge of the subject matter of the piece they are reviewing. So you might need to read around the subject a little, research the author, or look into any historical episodes that are described, in order to feel confident in your opinions.

Answers are marked on
ï      quality of your analysis and answering the question
ï      structure of your answer – move from an introduction to the key points you wish to make, then conclude.
ï      proper bibliography
ï      good use of sources – proper citation of ideas and quotations
ï      no plagiarism or  misuse of sources and web sites
ï      We will award minimal % for good presentation.

Examples of correct citation

Author, (date), Title, Source/Publisher

e.g. Book:
Smith N. 1994. Uneven Development. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Or if it’s a journal:
Boateng, P.K. 2017. Land Access, Agricultural Land Use Changes and Narratives about Land Degradation in the Savannahs of Northeast Ghana. Social Sciences 6 (1): 1 – 26

Web page:
New Internationalist. 2000. Issue on Africa. No. 326, August. Available at:   http://www.newint.org/issue326/contents.htm

Africa Book Review Evaluation Sheet

ï      introduction, including statement of question and/or argument  (poor         satisfactory       good)
ï      for book review – good summary of book                        (poor         satisfactory       good)
ï      paper structure, including logical sequence of ideas and argument,
conclusion                                          (poor         satisfactory       good)
ï      intelligent & critical assessment of the book or debate. Focus.       (poor         satisfactory       good)
ï      writing style, including clarity and conciseness                       (poor        satisfactory       good)
ï      grammar and syntax                                              (poor satisfactory       good)

ï      justification of argument using sources (if required)         (poor  satisfactory          good)
ï      appropriate citation of sources (in text and in bibliography)  (poor         satisfactory       good)
ï      use of illustrations (data, figures, tables, maps)*            (N/A          poor       satisfactory       good)

*not usually needed in a book review

Africa Book Book Review/Reading Assignment

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

COMU 3005 Media and Digital Cultures

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

cOMU 3005 Media and Digital Cultures

Reading  Assignment

Reading  Assignment

Type:  Reading  Assignment
Due  Date:
COMU 3005 Media Cultures Reading  Assignment 代写
22  Sep  17  17:00     Submit  via  TurnItIn  through  Blackboard
Weight:  25%
1000  words
Task  Description:
Students  are  required  to  interpret  and  critically  engage  with  one  title  from  the
Digital  Media  and  Society  series  (see  list  below).
•  Baym,  Nancy  (2010)  Personal  Connections  in  the  Digital  Age,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Burgess,  Jean  and  Green,  Joshua  (2009)  YouTube:  Online  Video  and  Participatory  Cultures,
Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Deuze,  Mark  (2007)  Media  Work,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Ess,  Charles  (2009)  Digital  Media  Ethics,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Halavais,  Alexander  (2009)  Search  Engine  Society,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Hand,  Martin  (2012)  Ubiquitous  Photography,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Hassan,  Robert  (2008)  The  Information  Society,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Jordan,  Tim  (2008)  Hacking:  Digital  Media  and  Technological  Determinism,  Cambridge:
Polity.
•  Lievrouw,  Leah  A.  (2011)  Alternative  and  Activist  New  Media,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Ling,  Rich  and  Donner,  Jonathon  (2009)  Mobile  Communication,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Matheson,  Donald  and  Allan,  Stuart  (2009)  Digital  War  Reporting,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Murthy,  Dhiraj  (2012)  Twitter:  Social  Communication  in  the  Digital  Age,  Cambridge:
Polity.
•  Papacharissi,  Zia  (2010)  A  Private  Sphere:  Democracy  in  a  Digital  Age,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Rettburg,  Jill  Walker  (2008)  Blogging,  Cambridge:  Polity.
•  Wikstrom,  Patrick  (2006)  The  Music  Industry:  Music  in  the  Cloud,  Cambridge:  Polity.
The  reading  report  (1,000  words)  should  (1)  summarise  the  content  of  the  book,
(2)  critically  evaluate  the  major  arguments  present  by  the  author(s)  and  (3)
explain  their  relevance  to  contemporary  digital  practice.  This  assignment  is
designed  to  reinforce  skills  of  deep  reading  and  critical  evaluation.
COMU 3005 Media Cultures Reading  Assignment

 

Introduction to Technical Article Review

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Introduction to Technical  Article Review 代写

1

Assessment 2 Article Review and Poster
Diploma of Engineering
Diploma of Information Technology
Introduction to Technical Communication
EITC001 IITC001
SEMESTER 03 2017
Credit points : 6
Pre-requisites : none
Subject Coordinator : Julie Sparks
Weight: 25%
Due Date: Week 5 (Article Review) Week 5 (Poster)
ASSESSMENT TASK 2 : LESSONS LEARNT IN ENGINEERING AND IT –
ARTICLE REVIEW AND POSTER PRESENTATION (WEIGHT 25%)
TASK DESCRIPTION
Students individually investigating an engineering or IT failure. One source is selected
on the case study for analysis according to the scaffold taught in the subject. A poster
is created to inform the class about the topic.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• (a) understand the role and value of communication in academic and professional
engineering and IT environments
• (b) use the UTS Library and Internet to access information using research and reading
skills
• (c) write competently in English, in a variety of genres, demonstrating your knowledge
of referencing, synthesis of information and the rules of plagiarism
• (d) participate effectively in peer learning activities
• (e) perform competently in oral communication situations with appropriate visual aids
• (f) demonstrate an ability to express technical and other concepts through
graphical/mathematical/visual communication
• (g) demonstrate creativity in presentations
• (h) reflect on personal learning experiences
Note : The information in this subject outline was correct at the time of printing. However, you should check
eStudent regularly for any updates to the information contained in this subject outline.
2
BRIEF
Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review 900 words 20%
Students investigate an engineering or IT event where there were lessons learnt that can be
applied to future projects. The failures or events do not have to be catastrophic and can relate
to process, maintenance, human error, construction techniques, design etc. Students can
choose from a list of topics or, in consultation with their Tutor, nominate their own. Students
find ONE (1) suitable and reliable source on their Lessons Learnt case study. The source
should ideally be around 2-6 pages. Students should focus on the background to the event
rather than the lessons learnt. Include peer review checklist with your report.
Questions that COULD be answered include:
•  When did the event occur?
•  Who did it involve?
•  Where did it happen?
•  What happened?
•  Why or how did it happen? What was the cause?
•  Who was responsible?
•  What was the cost – lives and money?
•  Anything else of interest – but NOT engineering lessons learnt.
Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Poster Presentation 5%
Students prepare a one page poster and have one-two minutes to tell the class about their
topic.
The poster is presented in class Week 5. Students can select their own creative way to present
the poster but it must be single page shown on computer screen. Presentation must introduce
the topic to the class. Poster should contain both text and graphics. Poster should be
uploaded to TURNITIN before presentation.
DUE DATE
Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review
Due Week 5
Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Two Minute Poster Presentation
Due Week 5
3
STYLE GUIDE REQUIREMENTS
• Each written task must be stapled.
• Submission is via hard copy. TURNITIN is a plagiarism check.
• Submit a soft copy of each written task to Turnitin and a hard copy to your tutor at the
start of class. Include a signed UTS:INSEARCH cover page.
• Print single or double sided A4 paper.
• Use 12 point Arial or Times New Roman font.
• Use 1.5 spacing and at least 2.5cm page margins.
• Include a header and footer on each page with:
o  Header: subject name and code, title of assessment task
o  Footer: your name and student number, page number
NOTES
 Your assignment must be free of plagiarism and be written by yourself without assistance.
 Late assignments will not be accepted unless there are exceptional circumstances and/or you make
arrangements in writing with the tutor before the due date. (See the subject description for further details.)
 If your assignment receives a pass mark or higher, the mark is final. Your tutor will explain why you
were awarded the mark, but cannot change it.
 Always keep electronic and/or hard copies of your assignments. Things can go wrong and
assignments can go missing. If they do, it is your responsibility to be able to re-submit your work
when requested.
4
Assessment Criteria
HD  D  C  P
1
Layout and
Introduction
identification,
academic reliability
10%
Assessment followed
style guide.
Exceptionally well set
out. Exceptionally clear
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability. Includes
second source for
verification.
Assessment followed
style guide. Very well
set out. Clear
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability. Includes
second source for
verification.
Assessment followed style
guide. Well set out. More
than satisfactory
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability of the text.
Assessment followed
most elements of style
guide. Well set out.
Basic identification of
text, and analysis of its
academic reliability.
2
Introduction
purpose, preview
10%
Exceptionally clear
enunciation of purpose
and preview of textual
analysis and
exceptionally concise
and comprehensive
overview of the main
sections and purpose of
the source text.
Clear enunciation of
purpose and preview of
textual analysis and
concise and
comprehensive overview
of the main sections and
purpose of the source
text.
More than satisfactory
enunciation of purpose
and preview of textual
analysis and more than
satisfactory overview of
the main sections and
purpose of the source text.
Basic enunciation of
purpose and preview of
textual analysis and
satisfactory overview of
the main sections and
purpose of the source
text.
3
Evidence of Active
Reading
15%
Richly detailed evidence
of active reading and
notes was submitted.
Questions/answers are
detailed and well-
paraphrased. Full,
Harvard-UTS styled
reference is present on
notes.
Richly detailed evidence
of active reading was
submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present
on notes.
Sufficiently detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present on
notes.
Passably detailed
evidence of active
reading was submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present
on notes.
4
Summary
20%
Excellent summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
Very good summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
Good summary of main
points and the relationship
between them.
Adequate summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
5
Conclusion 10%  Excellent summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Excellent details
of further research.
Very good summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Very good details
of further research.
Good summary of report
and concluding statement
of relationship of text to
the semester topic. Very
good details of further
research.
Adequate summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Good details of
further research.
6
Referencing
5%
In-text reference present
and correct. End-of-text
reference present and
correct
In-text reference present
with only insignificant
errors or omissions
and/or end-of-text
reference present with
only insignificant errors
or omissions.
In-text reference present
but with minor errors or
omissions and/or end-of-
text reference present but
with minor errors or
omissions
In-text reference present
but with significant
errors or omissions
and/or end-of-text
reference present but
with significant errors or
omissions
7
Language and
paragraph structure
10%
Meaning is very clear.
Paper has consistently
correct grammar,
spelling and paragraph
structure.
Meaning is very clear.
Paper has predominantly
correct grammar,
spelling and paragraph
structure.
Meaning is clear. Paper
has only insignificant
errors in grammar and/or
spelling and/or paragraph
structure.
Meaning is generally
clear. Paper has a few
errors in grammar and/or
spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
8
Poster Presentation
20%
Research was presented
in a very clear way with
excellent voice, eye
contact and body
language. Poster was
engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way with very
good voice, eye contact
and body language.
Poster was engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way with good
voice, eye contact and
body language. Poster
was engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way. One
element of voice, eye
contact or body
language hindered
presentation. Poster was
engaging.
5
Assessment Criteria
F3  F2  F1  F0
1
Layout and
Introduction
identification,
academic reliability
10%
Assessment followed
most elements of style
guide. Well set out. Weak
identification of text,
and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
Some elements of the
style guide missing.
Layout and presentation
poor. Unsatisfactory
identification of text
and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
Style guide not followed.
Layout poor. Does not
include identification of
text, and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
No identification of
the text or analysis
of its academic
reliability
2
Introduction
purpose, preview
10%
Weak enunciation of
purpose and/or preview of
report and/or less than
comprehensive overview
of the main sections of the
text or purpose missing.
Report and/or text preview
and/or purpose may be
missing.
Report preview and
purpose missing or text
preview and purpose
missing.
No purpose and
preview.
3
Evidence of Active
Reading (SQ3R)
15%
Passably detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted. Questions/
answers are well-
paraphrased. Important
details of reference are
missing on notes.
Passably detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted but large
sections of the
questions/answers are
either not paraphrased or
are poorly paraphrased.
Important details of
reference may be missing
on notes.
Evidence of active reading
was submitted but is
sparsely detailed
AND/OR no source was
submitted
No evidence of
active reading was
submitted.
4
Summary
20%
Inadequate summary of
main points and/or the
relationship between
them.
Incomplete summary of
main points and/or very
weak relationship
established between them.
Very weak and incomplete
summary of main points
and/or no relationship
established between them.
No summary of main
points.
5
Conclusion 10%  Weak summary of report
or concluding statement of
relationship of text to the
semester topic. Weak
details of further research.
Very weak summary or

Introduction to Technical  Article Review 代写

concluding statement of
relationship of text to the
semester topic. No details
of further research.
No summary of report
and/or concluding
statement does not relate
text to the semester topic.
No details of further
research.
No conclusion.
6
Referencing
5%
In-text reference present
with serious errors or
omissions and/or end-of-
text reference present but
with serious errors or
omissions.
In-text reference mostly
incorrect and/or end-of-
text reference mostly
incorrect.
In-text reference missing
and/or end-of-text
reference missing.
No referencing.
7
Language and
paragraph structure
10%
Overall meaning is clear.
Paper has some errors in
grammar and/or spelling
and/or paragraph
structure.
Overall meaning is
understandable. Paper has
many errors in grammar
and/or spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
Some parts are hard to
understand. Paper has
many errors in grammar
and/or spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
Report unreadable.
8
Poster Presentation
20%
Research was presented
in an understandable way
however one or two
elements of voice, eye
contact or body language
hindered presentation.
Poster was reasonable.
Poster was not loaded on
to TURNITIN.
Presentation was not very
clear or did not discuss
the case study. Poster was
cluttered and/or hard to
understand. Poster was
not loaded on to
TURNITIN.
Presentation was difficult
to understand and / or no
poster was prepared.
Poster was not loaded on
to TURNITIN.
No presentation.