Works cited and examples given must be from the book “The Moral Life,” 6th edition. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES can be used for cited work. academic essay help
Here is the writing prompt:
Beginning on page 883 of the textbook, we are presented with three groups of responses to world hunger. Each group has slightly differing views inside of it.academic essay help
1. Strong egalitarianism. Egalitarians generally believe that because all people have the same moral worth, all people are entitled to the world’s resources. On varying levels, human beings who have wealth are required to share it. In the case of Peter Singer, we must forgo luxuries and perhaps anything beyond basic needs to provide for the hungry.
2. Negative rights and lifeboat ethics. There is no obligation from wealthy nations to help those in need. Garrett Hardin moves a step further with this idea and argues that by giving to the needy, the wealthy nations of the world may in fact be perpetuating hunger or making the problem worse.academic essay help
3. Reasonable Beneficence. The duty of helping others must be weighed alongside other duties. Helping others must be weighed in accordance with helping one’s self, or in the case of a wealthy nation – the entire nation. Timmerman’s passage generally follows this position.
Using all that you have learned in this course, choose ONE of these ethical responses and thoroughly analyze it for its effectiveness. You may choose a response with which you agree OR one with which you disagree. In either case, explain what is beneficial AND what is harmful in the response – including to whom it is harmful or beneficial. Part of the grade for this paper will be determined by the use of your examples and counter-examples, as well as your analysis of those examples and counter-examples.
DO NOT analyze all three – only analyze ONE position and then argue for or against it.